Thursday, March 11, 2010
 
Mar 22

Written by: Rip Rowan
3/22/2009 7:02 AM 

Remember "Change You Can Believe In?"

Remember how we were going to do away with earmarks?  Toss out the lobbyists?  Get away from old-school politics-as-usual?

"Hope" - remember?  Isn't that why you voted for Obama?

Still feel that way?

Charles Krauthammer sums it up nicely:

It's not just pages and pages of special-interest tax breaks, giveaways and protections, one of which would set off a ruinous Smoot-Hawley trade war. It's not just the waste, such as the $88.6 million for new construction for Milwaukee Public Schools, which, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, have shrinking enrollment, 15 vacant schools and, quite logically, no plans for new construction.

It's the essential fraud of rushing through a bill in which the normal rules (committee hearings, finding revenue to pay for the programs) are suspended on the grounds that a national emergency requires an immediate job-creating stimulus - and then throwing into it hundreds of billions that have nothing to do with stimulus, that Congress' own budget office says won't be spent until 2011 and beyond, and that are little more than the back-scratching, special-interest, lobby-driven parochialism that Obama came to Washington to abolish. He said.

Right.  He continues:

After Obama's miraculous 2008 presidential campaign, it was clear that at some point the magical mystery tour would have to end. The nation would rub its eyes and begin to emerge from its reverie.

The hallucinatory Obama would give way to the mere mortal. The great ethical transformations promised would be seen as a fairy tale that all presidents tell -- and that this president told better than anyone.

I thought the awakening would take six months. It took two and a half weeks.

I don't blame you if you voted for Obama.  He's young, smart, charming and progressive.  John McCain is old and Republican and uninspiring.

Let's face it.  Obama's message was like a shot of smack to a nation full of people junked out on the drug of mass media messages.  We, as a nation, don't want to deal with our nation's problems.  Obama promised that, if elected, we wouldn't have to.  We got high on that message.

And now we gotta come down from the high.  Because like any drug, it's a false reality.  The real one is still out there waiting for us.

Look, don't get me wrong.  I don't know that McCain would have been any better.  The ruling class in Washington - Republicans and Democrats alike - are all dead-set on one task: aggregating as much power as possible in the hands of the Federal government.

And they're using the financial crisis as an excuse for immediate action.  We had choices.  There are other ways we could have stimulated the economy.  There were other alternatives.

None were heard.  There just wasn't time.

So, from all the possible alternative solutions, we just happened to get the one alternative that most grows the size and scope of the Federal government.

Somehow, this country must wake up.  We're entering a doomsday scenario:

  • a bankrupt government
  • using borrowed money
  • to bail out bankrupt companies
  • who lent borrowed money
  • to bankrupt borrowers.

It's positively Escherian.

Tags:

2 comment(s) so far...


Hey Rip. I was perusing Pleasantry Lane and Salim's website and wandered over here. I share your concerns about the government, and am a liberatarian myself (with the small L) who was forced into the Democratic party for the past few years, including voting for the O-man this past time around. I have been reading a lot of articles about what is going on, and talking to some smart people - none of us seem capable of fully getting our minds around what is going on. I am still trying to figure out why the government bailed out AIG, so I am still at step 1 of the maze. My current thinking, at least from what I can "feel" about everything that is going on, is that we are bailing out the wrong people. Right now, the vast bulk of the bailout funds have gone straight through the bankrupt companies like AIG into the hands of "creditors' who are making billions at taxpayer expense. These creditors are the people who were on the other side of the credit-default-swaps and "toxic" assets out there. I think we should have left them to dangle, and get flushed. They are making billions right now, getting paid in full on a bunch of transactions that generate nothing other than wealth - there is no actual point to what they are owed. Anyway, I'm tired and thought I'd chime in. Bob

By Bob Blumenfeld on   3/22/2009 10:40 PM

Yeah, you're talking about the bailout. I'm still on the "stimulus" plan. The bailout, now there's another deal. I plan on blogging about that too.

The issue I have with the bailout out is this: it's possible for banks to simply overlend. That's what has happened with the mortgage crisis. They lent to everyone in the market for a loan who had good credit, and then kept lending past that. We're overextended with personal / household debt across the board.

If we expect lender to resolve this problem, they can't keep lending as so many politicians think they should be doing with their bailout money. A lot more credit was extended past the "natural" rate of lending. It *has* to contract if the market is to stabilize.

And, if it contracts, that means a substantial decrease in the money supply. Everyone's so concerned about the amount of money the government is printing. Everyone's talking about inflation. I'm more concerned about deflation. Despite the current market bounce, I am still concerned that we could see a continued shrinkage of the real money supply.

By Rip Rowan on   3/23/2009 11:36 PM

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel 

Subscribe

Yeah, I'm
View Rip Rowan's profile on LinkedIn

Free MP3s on Last.fm



Web Design Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Sections
Tags
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2008 Rip Rowan